Thursday, October 23, 2008

Prospectus

In my paper, I will argue that a certain type of stem cell research called embryonic stem cell research is a very unnecessary and unethical research that should be done away with.  This issue is so important because in researching embryonic stem cells it is like the killing of a human being to some people.  Also, in embryonic stem cell research there are still scientific flaws, there have been little positive results, the government is inconsistent, and there are many more reliable alternatives to embryonic stem cell research.  I will write this paper to people all over the world who are uninformed about the issues to this controversial subject, and to the government so that they too will be against allowing scientists to research into embryos.  Also, I am writing this to inform people who are for embryonic stem cell research, just to argue against what they are doing, and what the effects of this research are.  For the government, I think I will really discuss how the government has played a really inconsistent role in this embryonic stem cell research and the alternatives to embryonic stem cell research.  When it comes to convincing the people unknown to the research a well as he people who are pro on embryonic stem cell research I will really emphasize on the scientific flaws, the little positive results, and the alternatives to stem cell research.

Works Cited

 

"Arguments Against Embryonic Stem Cell Research - Stem Cells Genetic Engineering." Bootstrike.Com - Guides, Tutorials, FAQs, Singapore Web Design Computer Services, Laughter HELL. 22 Oct. 2008 .

 

Deem, Rich. "What is Wrong With Embryonic Stem Cell Research?." Evidence for God from Science. 23 Nov. 2007. 22 Oct. 2008 .

 

"New medical marijuana, stem cell research ads air | Freep.com | Detroit Free Press." Freep.com | Detroit Free Press | Detroit news, community, entertainment, yellow pages and classifieds. Serving Detroit, Michigan. 22 Oct. 2008 .

 

Stearns, Hannah. "Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Should the Federal Funding be Expanded? ." The Cornell Daily Sun. 20 Oct. 2006. 22 Oct. 2008 .

 

"Stem Cell Basics [Stem Cell Information]." NIH Stem Cell Information Home Page. 22 Oct. 2008 .

 

 

Journal 5: Public Discourse (Brent Staples)

As much as I don’t want to think that I would feel the same way as the women Staples encounters on the streets at night, I really honestly would feel scared to. I could picture myself constantly peering over my shoulders and walking so fast it would probably seem as though I was running. In Staple’s paper he makes it seem as though women on the street at night are only scared of a tall black man walking by himself, having a beard, billowing hair, and both hands shoved into the pockets of his bulky military jacket. However, if I was walking on a street at night, I would be scared or at least uncomfortable of any man behind me walking by him, white or black. I thought it was a little extreme for someone to call security guards on Staples when he was rushing his article in to his editor. I mean wouldn’t the guards at least ask him what he was doing, that just seems like it shouldn’t be allowed for someone to accuse you for doing something, but not let you explain or at least try to plead your innocence. Also, that was weird to me that no one even recognized him at his own workplace. I find it as sad that America is still dealing with these stereotypes today. I think this paper is proof that discrimination is still alive and a problem in America today, even though some people want to believe that discrimination is no longer a problem and will deny it still exists. I found it kind of humorous that this six foot two black guy was such a softy; I guess I find it humorous that any big tall guy would be such a softy. That is another stereotype that is alive in America today; men are the dominant strong sex. Besides that little part that I found humorous in Staple’s paper, what I got out of reading this paper is that discrimination is still alive today. Also, I think that especially dealing with this specific instance of discrimination it is becoming more and more evident in America due to the high rate of terrorism and crime now-a-days, especially in urban areas. A good way to try and help fight against the discrimination that Staples is expressing through his paper, would be to walk in groups when you go out at night, and to make assumptions of people based on their physical appearance.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Rhetorical Analysis: Obama Speech

On February 10, 2007, Barack Obama made known his presidential announcement, “Our Past, Future, and Vision for America”.  Obama is claiming to the people of the United States that he has the knowledge, audacity, and experience to be the president of the United States.  He argues that even though it may seem impossible to do, he can lead America through the many changes that need to take place in order to transform America into a better America. Obama’s speech may be somewhat confusing, but it still draws on many forms of pathos, ethos, and logos and has just enough detail to let the world know what makes him such a good choice for the next President of the United States ("Obama Speech…”).

Barack Obama, the author of the speech, came from a hard background when he was young, his parents split up and eventually divorced when he was only two.  His parents both died when he was fairly young.  Barack was raised through from fifth grade until he graduated by his maternal grandparents in Hawaii.  It was during Obama’s college years when he really got interested in politics.  In 1985, after getting a degree in political science, Obama moved to Chicago, and it is here where he got elected to be the Illinois state senate as a democrat.  During these years he helped organize Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign as well as delivered John Kerry’s keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston.  Which then brings us to his presidential announcement speech in 2007 ("Barack Obama").

Throughout Obama’s speech, he influences many of the Americans through pathos.  One of the examples of pathos in his speech, which could also be referred to as a narrative style of rhetoric, is at the beginning when he was explaining the background of how he ended up in Illinois.  He was explaining to the people that when he came to Illinois he knew no one, he was young, and had no money or family.  He was trying to strike the emotions of the people to make them feel sorry for him.  Obama also sparked people’s emotions and feeling when he went on to say that it was when he was in these poor neighborhoods’ of Chicago, he received the best education he’d ever had, and learned the true meaning of his Christian faith.  Anytime anyone talks about poor people, people who are less than fortunate, or any the beginning of one’s religious life, most people tend to view it as an emotional subject.  This way, even if the people thought his argument was weak, they could fall back on their strong feelings for how hard he worked on his own to get to where he is at today.

 Obama also uses pathos throughout his speech every time he includes the American people in the changes that need to take place in America, for the good of America. For example, when Obama refers to changes like ending poverty, and freeing America from the tyranny of oil, he ends that particular subject with “Let’s do this”, or “Let’s be the generation that makes future generations proud of what we did here”.  When he says “let’s” he is essentially saying “let us”, and that “us” is referring to Barak Obama himself as well as the entire American people as a whole. Toward the end of his speech Obama also reemphasizes his point that he can’t change all these issues alone; it has to be us (America together).  Also, Obama makes it very clear by saying things like, “…they think they own this government, but we’re here today to take it back”, and “…I might play a small part in building a better America” that he believes the past leaders did a not so good job in leading America.  In ending his speech he leaves his audience with hope for the future stating, “Together, starting today, let us finish the work that needs to be done, and usher in a new birth of freedom on this Earth.” When someone is being involved in the outcome of the changes will affect them (like how Americans react to the changes happening in the United States), the person tends to be more emotional to the subject.  This emotion most often causes them to be more optimistic toward the person (in this case Obama) who is allowing them to take part in the changes that will affect their life. 

Another type of appeal that I noticed Obama use in his speech is ethos.  A couple different times Obama refers to former president Abraham Lincoln, and how Obama agrees with how Lincoln went about running the country during his presidency.  Abraham Lincoln was one of the most favored Presidents in the history of U.S. Presidents.  This type of rhetoric helps in persuading people onto Obama’s side because since people liked how Lincoln ran the country when he was in office, they will like how Obama will run the country if he ends up in office.  This could strengthen many of the American citizen’s view on Obama because they might think that since Obama is educated on Lincoln’s beliefs toward America and believes the same, that he will be just as good a President. 

The last appeal that Obama used was that of logos.  Toward the end of his speech, Obama made note that every four years a new campaign is raised and again both parties will make similar promises to the American people.   However, when he says that after the election is over, many times those promises are never kept.  He addresses his audience with logic and reason when he states that it won’t be any different when he is elected unless the people don’t stick with him in carrying these promises out.  He was very real when addressing the American people with this statement; I think it was because of this honesty that Obama really gained many people’s trust in him ("Obama Speech…”).

In conclusion, I think that Barack Obama gave a well thought out, credible speech to the people of America.  He obviously has the hard work ethic and trustworthiness to be President; he just has to prove that to the rest of the United States. He makes many statements that could have only been made by someone who really knew what was going on, and had a true love for the future the America as well as the American people. Obama gave just the right amount of information that allowed the people to really get a good idea on what Obama’s plans for the future could be without and confusion.  Overall, I think it was a very successful speech that appealed to many American views.


"Barack Obama." bio. True Story. 3 Oct. 2008 .

"Obama Speech - Presidental Annoucement - February 10 2007 - Complete Text." Obama Speeches - Full Text of Over 100 Speeches. 29 Sep. 2008 .